Everything and the Mobile Software Universe…

  • rss
  • Home
  • About

Must Read: Sender 11 on Mobile Application Development Fragmentation

Thomas Menguy | January 21, 2009

As I’ve advocated not so long ago in those 2 posts about capuchin and what it means to fragmentation and the Adobe packager and the trend it shows toward runtimes (cross posted to VisionMobile here for capuchin and here for Adobe packager).

But Sender 11 really have for me the best argument about it:

But the strange thing is I don’t hear developers complaining much about fragmentation any more. They may be too busy creating apps for the iPhone and Android. A straightforward, low barrier way to monetize your app apparently trumps standardization any day. A way to make money is more important than a way to save money.

Morten Hjerde, What’s your developer story?

Well what else to add? Adapting a software to platform is only a 2nd order issue if you can monetize it. Thanks to all the AppStores.

Anyway really take the time to read the whole article, very good analysis about fragmentation, maximized with those “open-but-proprietary-platform-with-my-very-own-apis-and-my-very-own-store”  where there is 0 compatibility between an Android application and an iPhone one…but who cares?

Anyway I think the fragmentation issue will pop back with the explosion of different AppStores and new platforms (perhaps an actor has something to do here :-) ), and I’m not convinced the browser will be the right way to do it.

Thanks Morten for this insightful article, hope to meet you in Barcelona!

Comments
No Comments »
Categories
Mobile Industry, development process
Tags
adobe, apis, apps, barcelona, capuchin, compatibility, developers, explosion, fragmentation, insightful article, iphone, packager, platforms, proprietary platform, trumps
Comments rss Comments rss
Trackback Trackback

What I’ve enjoyed reading

Recent Posts

  • You will be disappointed by your Android Market application sales…think twice before jumping on the little robot
  • Why Adobe should change its mobile strategy (again)
  • No Qt for S40, Maemo and Symbian apps won’t be compatible: is Nokia really willing to unify development for OVI Appstore?
  • Why Samsung Bada makes sense vs an Android-me-too journey
  • Flex on Mobile: What’s coming in ELIPS Studio…iPhone insights (and android teasing :) )

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox